Coming soon · Contract draft
Risks, Dependencies & Blockers
A common issue and dependency contract across project risks, execution blockers, gaps, and resolution items.
Reviewable specification — not callable
Canonical owner
Risk, dependency, blocker, and resolution services
Contract posture
P1 · Documentation first · implementation follows approval
Contract metadata
Draft version
0.2 review draft
Review owner
Delivery/Execute + Developer Platform
Last reviewed
July 14, 2026
Target wave
Wave 2 · Project and Execute core
Contract dependencies
- • Canonical domain service adapter
- • Optimistic concurrency and idempotency policy
- • Transactional event outbox
What this unlocks
Unify issue visibility
Read a stable domain model for risks, dependencies & blockers without depending on GUI routes or database shapes.
Link cross-project dependencies
Create a reviewable proposal and apply only the bounded commands the canonical owner permits.
Coordinate resolution safely
React to durable lifecycle facts and connect external systems with explicit direction and provenance.
Lifecycle and invariants
Risks, Dependencies & Blockers exposes a bounded lifecycle with explicit commands and named authority at every transition.
openmitigatingblockedresolvedaccepted| From | To | Command | Authority |
|---|---|---|---|
| open | mitigating | Start mitigation | Risk, dependency, and blocker services |
| mitigating | resolved | Resolve issue | Risk, dependency, and blocker services |
| open | accepted | Accept risk | Risk, dependency, and blocker services |
Lifecycle invariants
- • Every issue retains source provenance.
- • Resolution requires evidence or an attributable acceptance decision.
Authority boundaries
The interfaces expose canonical capabilities; they do not become a second owner of domain rules or state.
DigitalStack owns
- • Canonical issue identity and type
- • Dependency linkage and status
- • Resolution history and threshold state
Explicitly not building
- • Merging distinct sources without provenance
- • Agent-declared resolution without evidence
- • Event emission for every transient score change
Surface decisions
Deliberate additions, retained boundaries, and removals from the proposed external contract.
Canonical CRUD, dependency linkage, resolution, and threshold history
Integrators need one issue vocabulary across risks, blockers, gaps, and dependencies.
Aggregate risk read and source provenance
Existing agent reads are useful when drill-down remains bounded.
Automatic resolution and events for every score fluctuation
Transient projections are not durable business facts.
Project/engagement-scoped filtering on every read and command
A workspace API key is not a licence to read every project. Access composes workspace membership with per-project visibility, so integrators receive exactly the engagements they are entitled to.
Interface plan
REST API
PlannedVersioned risks, dependencies & blockers resources, commands, idempotency, and operation status.
Reads + explicit commands
GraphQL
PlannedComposable DeliveryRisk reads with mutations delegated to the same canonical domain service.
Composable reads + bounded delegated mutations
MCP / Agent API
PlannedBounded read, draft, and confirmed apply tools with evidence and audit attribution.
Read + proposal/confirmed commands only
Webhooks
PlannedPast-tense delivery risk lifecycle facts with minimal payloads.
Past-tense durable facts only
Connected Apps
PlannedIssue trackers / Slack / Teams plus consumer clients, with declared direction and authority.
Declared direction and field authority required
Cross-interface parity
Each surface delegates to the named canonical owner; a blank surface is an intentional denial of authority, not missing documentation.
| Capability | REST | GraphQL | MCP | Webhook | Canonical owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary read | GET /delivery/risks | deliveryRisk(id: ID!): DeliveryRisk | get_risks_dependencies | — | Risk, dependency, blocker, and resolution services |
| Primary command | POST /delivery/risks | draftDeliveryRiskChange(input: DraftDeliveryRiskChangeInput!): DeliveryRiskChangeProposal! | draft_risks_dependencies_change | delivery_risk.created | Risk, dependency, blocker, and resolution services |
Proposed scopes
Proposed scopes are not grantable yet.
delivery-risks:readplanned scopedelivery-risks:writeplanned scopedelivery-risks:operateplanned scopeBehavioral contract
Cross-cutting rules every implementation and interface must satisfy.
Project / engagement-scoped access
A project and its engagement are the same object here. Resources are scoped to the projects the principal can access: workspace membership plus project-level visibility — owners and admins see every project, other principals see only the projects they created, were role-assigned, or were added to as members. List endpoints return only visible projects’ resources; detail endpoints enforce that visibility before returning or changing anything.
Canonical delegation
Every interface delegates to Risk, dependency, blocker, and resolution services; no resolver, gateway, worker, or connector reimplements domain rules.
Least-privilege principals
Scopes are evaluated with tenant, role, field-visibility, and principal-type constraints before data is read or changed.
Safe writes
Mutations use explicit confirmation where required, optimistic concurrency, idempotency, and durable actor attribution.
Transactional facts
Webhook facts are emitted from the canonical commit path, versioned, minimal, and safe to redeliver.
Declared provider authority
Every Connected App declares direction, field authority, provenance, and conflict behavior before activation.
REST API
Proposed endpoints
/api/v1/delivery/risksList risks, dependencies & blockers
Return an authorized, paginated collection with stable filters and provenance.
delivery-risks:read
/api/v1/delivery/risksconfirmationCreate DeliveryRisk
Create one canonical resource with idempotency and actor attribution.
delivery-risks:write
/api/v1/delivery/risks/{id}Retrieve DeliveryRisk
Return canonical detail, lifecycle state, permissions, and allowed actions.
delivery-risks:read
/api/v1/delivery/risks/{id}confirmationUpdate DeliveryRisk
Update bounded editable fields using optimistic versioning.
delivery-risks:write
/api/v1/delivery/risks/{id}/resolveconfirmationresolve DeliveryRisk
Run one explicit domain command after validation and authorization.
delivery-risks:operate
resolve a DeliveryRisk
curl --request POST \
+ --url https://www.digitalstack360.com/api/v1/delivery/risks/delivery_risk_123/resolve \
+ --header "Authorization: Bearer $DSTACK_API_KEY" \
+ --header "Content-Type: application/json" \
+ --header "Idempotency-Key: risks-dependencies-resolve-v2" \
+ --data '{
"expected_version": 2,
"reason": "Confirmed through the reviewed integration workflow"
}'{
"data": {
"id": "delivery_risk_123",
"status": "resolved",
"version": 3,
"operation_id": "op_01k4..."
}
}GraphQL
Proposed graph
Types
DeliveryRiskDeliveryRiskConnectionDeliveryRiskChangeProposalOperationQueries
deliveryRisk(id: ID!): DeliveryRiskdeliveryRiskList(filter: DeliveryRiskFilter, pagination: PaginationInput): DeliveryRiskConnection!Mutations
draftDeliveryRiskChange(input: DraftDeliveryRiskChangeInput!): DeliveryRiskChangeProposal!applyDeliveryRiskChange(input: ApplyDeliveryRiskChangeInput!): DeliveryRiskPayload!query DeliveryRiskDetail($id: ID!) {
deliveryRisk(id: $id) {
id
status
version
updatedAt
allowedActions { id label requiresConfirmation }
source { kind externalId }
}
}MCP / Agent API
Proposed tools
Get Risks, Dependencies & Blockers
get_risks_dependenciesRead the authorized risks, dependencies & blockers state, provenance, and allowed actions.
- Scope
- delivery-risks:read
- Input
- Resource id or a bounded filter.
- Output
- Canonical detail with source provenance and allowed actions.
- Write boundary
- Read only.
Draft Risks, Dependencies & Blockers change
draft_risks_dependencies_changeBuild a reviewable proposal from explicit user intent and DigitalStack evidence.
- Scope
- delivery-risks:write
- Input
- Target, requested outcome, expected version, and optional evidence references.
- Output
- A persisted proposal, validation results, and conflicts.
- Write boundary
- Creates a proposal; it does not mutate canonical state.
Apply Risks, Dependencies & Blockers change
apply_risks_dependencies_changeApply a reviewed proposal through the canonical service.
- Scope
- delivery-risks:operate
- Input
- Proposal id, expected version, idempotency key, and explicit confirmation.
- Output
- Updated canonical resource and audit reference.
- Write boundary
- Confirmation, optimistic versioning, and idempotency required.
User: Review the proposed risks, dependencies & blockers change and help me apply it.
1. Call get_risks_dependencies to inspect current state, provenance, and allowed actions.
2. Call draft_risks_dependencies_change to create a proposal without changing canonical state.
3. Show validation results, conflicts, and the exact command to the user.
4. After explicit confirmation, call apply_risks_dependencies_change with the proposal version.
Never infer authority from access to the MCP client.Webhooks
Proposed event catalog
Event types
delivery_risk.createdplanned eventA canonical DeliveryRisk was created.
payload: delivery_risk_id, status, created_at
delivery_risk.updatedplanned eventGoverned DeliveryRisk fields changed.
payload: delivery_risk_id, changed_fields, version, occurred_at
delivery_risk.resolvedplanned eventThe resolve command completed.
payload: delivery_risk_id, prior_status, status, occurred_at
{
"event_id": "evt_01k4...",
"type": "delivery_risk.resolved",
"event_version": 1,
"occurred_at": "2026-07-16T14:22:04Z",
"workspace_id": "ws_abc123",
"resource": {
"type": "delivery_risk",
"id": "delivery_risk_123"
},
"actor": {
"id": "user_123"
},
"payload": {
"delivery_risk_id": "delivery_risk_123",
"prior_status": "draft",
"status": "resolved"
},
"source": null
}Connected Apps
Proposed connection roles
Claude / ChatGPT / IDE clients
Consumer application
Read, explain, and submit bounded risks, dependencies & blockers proposals through MCP.
Authority: Client access never implies domain approval or unrestricted mutation authority.
Issue trackers / Slack / Teams
Source connector
Supply issue evidence and escalation context.
Authority: Source records map into canonical issues; they do not replace them.
Open contract decisions
Resolve before implementation approval
- • Should accepted risk and resolved risk remain separate terminal states across every source type?
Proof obligations
| Must remain true | Failure indicator |
|---|---|
| Risk, dependency, blocker, and resolution services remains the singular canonical owner. | An interface or connector persists a second authoritative lifecycle state. |
| Draft and apply remain separate actions. | An agent or integration silently converts inferred intent into a canonical mutation. |
| Every write is attributable, versioned, and idempotent. | A retry duplicates work or stale state overwrites a newer human decision. |
| Connected App direction and field authority are explicit. | Provider data silently becomes canonical or conflicts are resolved without policy. |